Investigation
Johnson & Johnson offers $5.5 million to settle about 76000 baby powder cancer claims


Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has offered to pay as much as $5.5bn (£4.14bn) to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits in the US alleging that its baby powder and other products containing talcum cause ovarian cancer.
Johnson & Johnson on Monday said the settlement covers about 76,000 claims, including ones consolidated in a federal court in New Jersey, and related cases in state court, ?representing nearly all of the remaining talc claims against the company.
The US multinational had previously settled most of the cases alleging that its talc contained asbestos and caused mesothelioma.
Plaintiffs’ law firms confirmed the deal on Monday, saying it was a good resolution after a 10-year court battle. The deal must be accepted by 95% of the ovarian cancer claimants in state or federal court before it becomes final.
Johnson & Johnson’s vice-president of litigation, Erik Haas, said the claims were “meritless” and that the company was willing to settle in order to get closure.
“While we are confident the company would have ultimately prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it and remain focused on its mission to develop medicines and devices that save lives,” Haas said.
Johnson & Johnson expects to pay $3bn in 2027, and it will make further payments in 2028. But the deal could be worth more, depending on how many people participate in the settlement.
Chris Seeger, a lawyer who represents about 2,500 clients with talc claims and helped negotiate the agreement, said Johnson & Johnson could ultimately pay $7bn or more.
The settlement assigns specific values to qualifying ovarian cancer claims but does not cap Johnson & Johnson’s total payout, Seeger said. “We got a fair settlement, and our clients are going to be happy with it.”
Johnson & Johnson reached the settlement after a series of wins in court, including victories in individual trials, successful efforts to disqualify plaintiffs’ lawyers from the litigation, and court rulings against experts that plaintiffs had used to prove their cases in court.

Breaking2 days agoâIf my son ever gets a girl pregnant, he’s leaving my house immediatelyâ â Cardi B shares parenting stance
Society3 days agoTransfer: Chelsea announce deal for Merrick
Breaking2 days agoâI used to think love was about finding the right person, but at 30, I don’t believe that anymoreâ â BBN star, Sheggz.
Investigation2 days agoâThe Olodo uprising term was not coined by meâ â Nigerian musician Ycee
News3 days agoAfrican nations adopt plan for cheaper internet, smartphones
Investigation3 days agoEbola d3aths in DR Congo surge past 1,300 as v!rus âspreading like a wildfireâ
Society3 days agoRussia expects another 30,000 North Korean soldiers – Zelensky
Society2 days agoBallon d’Or 2026: ‘They’re ahead of Kane’ – Petit names three favourites to win award














