ICC chief prosecutor removed from post over sexual misconduct claims – diplomats

Member state representatives of the International Criminal Court (ICC) have voted to remove the global tribunal’s chief prosecutor, nearly two years after sexual misconduct allegations against him first emerged, two diplomats have told The Associated Press (AP).

British barrister Karim Khan has been accused of sexual misconduct with a female aide, as outlined by the AP in a series of stories, allegations which he has steadfastly denied.

By a large majority, the ICC’s 125 member states ousted Mr Khan from his position, the first time a chief prosecutor has ever been removed from office.

The 56-year-old was temporarily removed from his duties at the ICC in June, pending Friday’s vote, after a report by the executive committee of the court’s oversight body found he had committed “serious misconduct”.

According to documents seen by the AP, Mr Khan engaged in a sexual relationship with the woman and tried to prevent her from pursuing her allegations.

Mr Khan disputes those findings.

Early in the session, a motion brought by Sierra Leone that would have made it harder to oust Mr Khan failed and diplomats quickly moved forward to vote on removal, several hours ahead of schedule, according to three diplomatic sources who were familiar with the proceedings.

The lengthy and complicated process has pitted human rights advocates, staff and member states against one another at a time when the court is already facing daunting challenges, including a campaign by the United States to “dismantle” the ICC, which was established to prosecute people responsible for humanity’s worst crimes.

In a statement last week, secretary of state Marco Rubio said the US was launching a “sweeping campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the International Criminal Court to US sovereignty”.

Mr Rubio said he will pressure member states to withdraw from the institution, sanction organisations that work with the court and ban staff from travelling to the United States.

Countries that “enjoy the benefits of the US security umbrella” will be called upon to reject the court’s jurisdiction over US citizens.

President Donald Trump’s administration has already brought sanctions against Mr Khan and a dozen other ICC staff in retaliation for warrants the court has issued for top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over the war in Gaza and investigations into US personnel in Afghanistan.

“Karim Khan believed that by launching a political witch hunt against Israel and issuing a politically motivated arrest warrant against Prime Minister Netanyahu, the world would ignore the grave sexual misconduct allegations against him. He was wrong,” Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon said in a statement.

The allegations have become entwined with the court’s investigation into the war in Gaza, experts said.

“Political considerations have been folded into this, especially as it is the first time a prosecutor has pursued warrants against a Western ally,” Iva Vukusic, a researcher at Utrecht University who has been following the process, told the AP.

Mr Khan’s removal will have no immediate impact on the arrest warrants in 2024 for Mr Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant for crimes against humanity, which can only be withdrawn by ICC judges.