OpenAI says its AI system acted on its own in ‘unprecedented’ hack of other firm

ChatGPT maker OpenAI has said that its artificial intelligence system hacked into another AI company on its own in what the firm called an “unprecedented cyber incident”.

“We had a significant security incident during evaluation of our models,” OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said in a statement posted on social media.

AI start-up Hugging Face said last week that it had detected an intrusion into its data processing systems that it suspected was caused by an AI agent autonomously acting on its own.

https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2079658951264920020?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

“We suspected last week’s cyber attack might have come from a frontier lab, given the sophistication of the agent,” Hugging Face co-founder and chief executive Clement Delangue said in a statement.

“Turns out it did!”

The disclosure comes amid heightened concerns about the cybersecurity capabilities of powerful models that led US President Donald Trump to sign an executive order in June creating a framework for the federal government to vet the national security risks of the most advanced AI systems for up to a month before their public release.

“AI is accelerating the discovery and exploitation of vulnerabilities,” OpenAI said in its statement on Tuesday.

“The primary lesson from this incident is that model security and safety must keep pace with rapidly advancing capabilities.”

Mr Delangue said he had spent the past 24 hours working with OpenAI, “and we strongly believe there was no malicious intent on their part”.

“It’s quite mind-blowing that all of this happened autonomously!” he added.

Mr Delangue said that it “might be the first incident of its kind”.

OpenAI said the intrusion was caused by a combination of its AI models, including its newly released GPT‑5.6 Sol and an “even more capable” model that is still being tested internally.

OpenAI said its AI used stolen credentials and discovered a previously unknown vulnerability to access Hugging Face servers.

It went to “extreme lengths to achieve a rather narrow testing goal” and “found ways to gain access to secret information that it could use to cheat the evaluation”, the company said.