Alleged national security breach: Deji Adeyanju testifies in El-Rufai’s trial

Human rights lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, on Monday testified in the ongoing trial of former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, charged with alleged breach of national security.

Adeyanju gave his testimony as 2nd prosecution witness (PW-2) before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

He was being led in evidence by Oluwole Aladedoye, SAN, Department of State Services’ counsel.

The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the DSS sued El-Rufai after he claimed during a television interview that he intercepted a telephone conversation involving the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu.

The ex-governor had alleged that the conversation, on the telephone, revealed instructions to security operatives to arrest him.

He linked the alleged directive to an incident at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport on February 12 after his return from Cairo, Egypt.

When the case was called on Monday, Adeyanju, who stepped into the witness box, presented the subpoena through which he was summoned to testify in the case.

Aladedoye then applied to tender the letter of subpoena as evidence.

After El-Rufai’s lawyer, Paul Erokoro, SAN, did not object the application, Justice Abdulmalik admitted it in evidence and marked it as “Exhibit G.”

Testifying, Adeyanju recalled that on February 12, reports emerged that El-Rufai was either going to be arrested or invited by security agencies.

He said that before the television interview that led to the charges, he had publicly urged the former governor to present himself for investigation, insisting that the matter was not politically motivated.

The PW-2 told the court that the television station invited him to the programme on February 13, the same day El-Rufai granted the interview that formed the basis of the charges.

“I went to Arise, and El-Rufai was also on the show.

“My segment came after his. During his interview, I listened to him speak on many issues, and I countered many of the things he said because they were not true or were half-truths,” he said.

The lawyer then applied for the interview recording which El-Rufai granted for it to be played in open court.

The court granted the application, and the same video earlier played during the testimony of the PW-1 was replayed.

After the video was replayed, Adeyanju confirmed that it reflected what he “witnessed on 13 February.”

The prosecution then sought to tender Adeyanju’s own recorded interview with the same anchor, Charles Aniagolu, alongside a certificate of compliance.

The court admitted the flash drive and the certificate of compliance and marked them as “Exhibits H” and “H1,” after  El-Rufai’s lawyer raised no objection.

The Arise TV interview with Adeyanju was also played in court after the application to the effect.

In the video, the anchor, Anyagolu, asked Adeyanju whether he believed the government truly intended to arrest El-Rufai.

Responding, Adeyanju said the DSS would have arrested him at the airport if that was their intention.

He also referred to a claim that the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) was already investigating El-Rufai at the time.

Responding to questions on whether the ex-governor had said he would honour an EFCC invitation, Adeyanju, in the video, maintained that he did not believe an airport arrest was likely.

“I don’t think so, knowing the kind of person that he is,” he said.