Investigation
Trump effort to expand speedy deportations of migrants can proceed, Appeals court rules


A federal appeals court handed US President Donald Trump a significant victory in his mass deportation efforts with a ruling on Tuesday, June 23, reviving his administration’s move to speed up deportations of undocumented immigrants in the United States.
The ruling from the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals allows the Trump administration to cast a wider net over who is subject to the fast-track deportation procedure known as “expedited removal.” This mechanism allows immigration authorities to remove an individual from the country without a hearing before an immigration judge.
The decision allows the administration to move forward with its plan to quickly deport undocumented immigrants residing in the United States who cannot prove they have lived in the country continuously for two years or more. A trial court had previously blocked the administration’s January 21, 2025, maneuver to expand the policy beyond its prior limits, which restricted the process to migrants apprehended within 100 miles of a land border and within 14 days of arrival.
Judges Justin Walker and Neomi Rao sided with the administration in the decision. Judge Robert Wilkins dissented from the majority.
The majority opinion rejected the challengers’ arguments that the expanded policy violated the Constitution’s right to due process.
The Department of Homeland Security’s General Counsel, James Percival, celebrated the ruling publicly, stating that the DC Circuit vindicated the administration’s decision to apply the law as written. He noted that the department had previously limited expedited removal to 14 days despite statutory allowance for individuals who entered the country illegally within the last two years.
He added a reminder regarding the administration’s active self-deportation program, which offers a 2,600 dollar stipend for voluntary departures.
Civil rights organizations strongly criticized the judicial outcome, warning that the expansion of fast-track deportations will bypass critical legal protections. Anand Balakrishnan, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and lead counsel in the case, stated that the ruling undermines fundamental due process principles when the government seeks deportation, adding that the legal team is currently exploring its next options.

Investigation1 day agoHe said he wanted to sleep with me, but I told him I am a married woman – Lady in viral video being ass@ulted by a man in Abia speaks
World2 days agoRussia burning as Ukraine launches massive attack on key waterway 160 miles from frontline
World16 hours agoRussia launches nuclear drill in UK's backyard as Kremlin 'advocates use of atomic bomb'
Breaking3 days agoâCars can no longer enter my street in Lekki due to floodâ – Actress Cossy Ojiakor lament
Investigation1 day agoActress, Angela Okorie responds after facing backlash for burning outfit she wore to late colleague, Alexx Ekuboâs funeral
Investigation1 day agoâSeek help from usâ â NDLEA tells Nigerians battling Drug addiction
Investigation13 hours agoThose who called Jonathan clueless are now in Power â Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor
News3 days agoEx-NIRSAL consultant, Stephen Ogidan loses as Supreme Court upholds forfeiture of N1.5bn














