"Charlie’s assassination wasn’t even about him": Candace Owens sparks outrage with explosive new Charlie Kirk assassination claim

Conservative commentator Candace Owens has been hit by a new wave of controversy after a viral social media post accused her of making increasingly explosive claims about the death of Charlie Kirk. The attack comes after Owens, in comments, questioned whether Kirk was killed after he refused to take part in a plot against her. The comments have sparked an outcry online with supporters and critics clashing over the claims.

Candace Owens’ Charlie Kirk comments trigger viral reaction

The latest backlash intensified after a widely shared post on X criticised Owens for centring herself in the discussion surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. The post claimed that her recent remarks had gone beyond previous allegations and accused her of making the tragedy about herself.The viral post read:“WOW 😮Candace Owens is now saying that Charlie Kirk might’ve been killed because he refused to kill her‼️Instead of dialing things back after the preliminary hearing she’s dialing things up with even more outrageous claims than ever. And she’s psychotically referring to herself in the third person while doing so.Her entire fake “investigation” has been all about making Charlie’s death all about her.She disrespects and smears everyone else grieving his loss including his wife and tries to establish herself as the only one grieving.Now she’s trying to convince her fans that Charlie’s assassination wasn’t even about him. It was all about her. Going so far as to say that Charlie was killed because he wouldn’t help kill her.This is obviously ridiculous for many reasons. But in the eyes of her devoted cultists Candace Owens is the most important figure on earth and they literally believe that she’s dodging assassins daily like John Wick or some sort of action movie star.”The post quickly spread across social media, drawing thousands of reactions as users debated both Owens’ statements and the criticism directed at her.

Candace Owens raises new questions about Charlie Kirk investigation

During her latest discussion, Owens expanded on her theory, suggesting there were unanswered questions surrounding conversations that allegedly took place before Charlie Kirk’s death.She said:“I know what my gut has told me about the situation from the moment that it took place. I know what beyond my gut and beyond my dreams, the statement from Andrew Colbett, it was supposed to be you, was it? Was it?”“Is it fair to ask if it’s plausible that when Charlie was taken to the Hamptons, the phone call no one wants to address from BB Net and Yahoo, is it fair to ask the question if it was literally supposed to be me who was supposed to be back on tour with Charlie? Did he say no to killing Candace Owens? And then did he become a liability because he said no? What did Charlie turn down from BB Net and Yahoo while Erika was there?”“Again, the people that were present don’t even wanna acknowledge the phone call. I only got an acknowledgement that it happened from Erika in person who then said, oh, he was just following up on a letter that Charlie wrote in May. Really?”“Bill Ackman’s house, you put BB Net and Yahoo on the phone? And he’s just like, hey, I got your letter. I wanna talk about that letter from months ago. This feels like a good time. I don’t buy it, guys. I think this is darker than we could ever imagine. I think.”Owens did not present evidence supporting these claims in the remarks referenced above. As the debate continues across social media, her latest comments have intensified scrutiny over both her ongoing commentary and the broader public conversation surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death.