Connect with us

Investigation

Singer Michael Jackson’s estate scores big win in court in child s3x trafficking lawsuit

Published

on

Singer Michael Jackson

Michael Jackson’s estate has won a significant court victory after a federal judge in California ruled that allegations made by four siblings who accused the late pop star of s3xually abus!ng them as children must be handled through private arbitration rather than a public trial.

The Cascio siblings, Edward, Dominic, Marie-Nicole and Aldo, filed a lawsuit against Jackson’s estate in February 2026, alleging that Jackson r@ped and m0lested them over a period of more than a decade. In Wednesday’s ruling, the judge found that a 2019 settlement between the parties was enforceable and required disputes between them to be resolved through private arbitration.

The settlement reportedly included an arbitration clause. The judge therefore concluded that the case had to be sent to arbitration rather than proceed in court. The siblings had been close to Jackson during their childhood and reportedly regarded him as part of their family. They had previously defended the singer when allegations of child s3xual @buse emerged against him.

Their position changed after the release of the 2019 HBO documentary Leaving Neverland, which they said caused them to reconsider their previous support for Jackson. The siblings subsequently filed their lawsuit, accusing Jackson of sexual abuse and alleging that people around him participated in a cover-up.

Jackson’s estate has categorically denied the allegations. The estate previously reached a reported $3.5 million settlement with the siblings without admitting wrongdoing, with the agreement containing the arbitration provision at the centre of the latest ruling.

The decision means the allegations will now be considered in private arbitration rather than before a jury in an open courtroom. Howard King, an attorney representing the Cascio siblings, expressed disappointment with the ruling.

“It’s disappointing, but not surprising, that the decision on whether the Cascios were duped into signing an unconscionable agreement with an arbitration clause will be made by an arbitrator rather than a jury of peers,” King said. He added that the family had hoped for a public trial addressing what they described as decades of abuse and an alleged cover-up.

“The family had hoped the court would allow for a public trial over the decades-long molestations of the Cascio siblings by Michael Jackson and the ensuing cover-up by his advisors. Instead, the family will seek justice from the dark confines of a private conference room,” King said. Jackson’s estate declined to comment on the ruling.

Trending